Radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: efficacy and tolerability.

Autor: Backlund E; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden., Grozman V; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm., Egyhazi Brage S; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden., Lewensohn R; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden., Lindberg K; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden., Helgadottir H; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) [Acta Oncol] 2023 Dec; Vol. 62 (12), pp. 1921-1930. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 25.
DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2280766
Abstrakt: Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) is primarily considered as a palliative treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, observations suggest that when RT is combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it can induce an immune response leading to an anti-tumoral effect also distant from the irradiated area - a phenomenon called 'abscopal effect'. The frequency and circumstances of abscopal effect among metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain and further research is necessary.
Material and Method: This retrospective study included all metastatic melanoma patients who received non-stereotactic RT in Stockholm, Sweden in 2015-2020. Patients were grouped depending on if RT was given at start of ICI (RT + ICI(start)), at ICI progression (RT + ICI(salvage)) or without ICI (RT(only)). Response rates in irradiated (RR(irradiated)) and overall response rates in non-irradiated (ORR(non-irradiated)) metastases were evaluated together with survival and toxicity in each cohort.
Results: In the RT + ICI(start) ( n  = 47), RT + ICI(salvage) ( n  = 41) and RT(only) ( n  = 55) cohorts, RR(irradiated) was 70.7%, 67.5% and 43.1% ( p  = 0.018) while the ORR(non-irradiated) was 36.1%, 14.8% and 0.0% ( p  = 0.003), and the median overall survival was 18.2, 15.0 and 7.2 months, respectively ( p  = 0.014). Local response to RT was in all cohorts associated with longer survival ( p  < 0.001). The frequency of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 17.0% and 19.5% in the RT + ICI(start) and RT + ICI(salvage) cohorts. No increased frequency of RT-related adverse events was seen in the RT + ICI cohorts, compared to the RT(only) cohort.
Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that melanoma patients receiving RT in combination with ICI had a superior antitumoral response in both irradiated and non-irradiated lesions as compared to patients receiving only RT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients receiving RT when progressing on ICI experienced tumor regression also in non-irradiated areas.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje