Autor: |
Golubović Z; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Danilov I; Tipteh d.o.o., 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Bojović B; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Petrov L; Innovation Center of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Sedmak A; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Mišković Ž; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia., Mitrović N; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Polymers [Polymers (Basel)] 2023 Oct 24; Vol. 15 (21). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 24. |
DOI: |
10.3390/polym15214197 |
Abstrakt: |
Additive manufacturing technologies have developed rapidly in recent decades, pushing the limits of known manufacturing processes. The need to study the properties of the different materials used for these processes comprehensively and in detail has become a primary goal in order to get the best out of the manufacturing itself. The widely used thermoplastic polymer material acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) was selected in the form of both filaments and ABS-like resins to investigate and compare the mechanical properties through a series of different tests. ABS-like resin material is commercially available, but it is not a sufficiently mechanically studied form of the material, which leads to the rather limited literature. Considering that ABS resin is a declared material that behaves like the ABS filament but in a different form, the objective of this study was to compare these two commercially available materials printed with three different 3D printers, namely Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP). A total of 45 test specimens with geometries and test protocols conforming to the relevant standards were subjected to a series of tensile, three-point bending and compression tests to determine their mechanical properties. Characterization also included evaluation of morphology with 2D and 3D microscopy, dimensional accuracy of 3D scans, and Shore A hardness of each material and 3D printing process. Tensile testing results have shown that FDM toughness is 40% of the value for DLP. FDM elongation at break is 37% of DLP, while ultimate tensile stress for SLA is 27% higher than FDM value. Elastic modulus for FDM and SLA coincide. Flexure testing results indicate that value of DLP flexural modulus is 54% of the FDM value. SLA strain value is 59% of FDM, and DLP ultimate flexure stress is 77% of the value for FDM. Compression test results imply that FDM specimens absorb at least twice as much energy as vat polymerized specimens. Strain at break for SLA is 72% and strain at ultimate stress is 60% of FDM values. FDM yield stress is 32% higher than DLP value. SLA ultimate compressive stress is half of FDM, while value for DLP compressive modulus is 69% of the FDM value. The results obtained are beneficial and give a more comprehensive picture of the behavior of the ABS polymers used in different forms and different AM processes. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|