Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Autor:	Wehr S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany., Weigel L; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany., Davis J; Psychiatric Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.; Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Baltimore, MD., Galderisi S; Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy., Mucci A; Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy., Leucht S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Schizophrenia bulletin [Schizophr Bull] 2024 Jul 27; Vol. 50 (4), pp. 747-756.
DOI:	10.1093/schbul/sbad137
Abstrakt:	Background and Hypothesis: Negative symptoms are very important for the overall loss of functioning observed in patients with schizophrenia. There is a need for valid tools to assess these symptoms. Study Design: We used the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) systematic review guideline to evaluate the quality of the clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms (CAINS) as a clinician-rated outcome measurement (ClinROM). Study Results: The search strategy resulted in the retrieval of 13 articles, 11 of which were included in this evaluation. In terms of risk of bias, most articles reported on measures of internal consistency and construct validity, which were overall of good quality. Structural validity, reliability, measurement error, and cross-cultural validity were reported with less than optimum quality. There was a risk of bias in ClinROM development. According to the updated criteria of good measurement properties, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability showed good results. In contrast, hypothesis testing was somewhat poorer. Results for cross-cultural validity were indeterminate. According to the updated GRADE approach from the COSMIN group the scale received a moderate grade. Conclusions: The COSMIN standard allows a judgment of the CAINS as an instrument with the potential to be recommended for use, but which requires further research to assess its quality, in particular in the domains of content validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity. (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu