Extreme Risk Protection Orders: Legislative Intent and Clinician Guidance.
| Autor: | Wortzel HS, Simonetti JA, Knoepke CE, Simpson JR, Brar L, Westmoreland P, Matarazzo BB |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of psychiatric practice [J Psychiatr Pract] 2023 Nov 01; Vol. 29 (6), pp. 480-488. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 01. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000749 |
| Abstrakt: | In this second column of a 2-part series exploring extreme risk protections orders, we utilize recent events in Colorado, including legislative efforts to expand the list of eligible petitioners to include clinicians, as an opportunity to explore questions and challenges faced by mental health and medical professionals serving in this capacity. Clinicians are in need of more clear guidance, given an emerging role that comes without clear evidence or practice standards to inform individualized clinical decision-making, and which potentially pits public safety interests against patient care needs, especially those pertaining to therapeutic relationships. In the interim, clinicians will best serve their patients by continuing to practice in a fashion that is analogous to decision-making around other interventions with serious implications for patient autonomy such as involuntary hospitalization. Ongoing collaboration with legislators is needed to arrive at laws that are informed by the limitations inherent in clinical risk assessment and that can be translated into clinical practices that simultaneously support patient needs and community safety. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|