The value of combined detailed first-trimester ultrasound-biochemical analysis for screening fetal aneuploidy in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing.

Autor: Ye C; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Duan H; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Liu M; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Liu J; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Xiang J; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Yin Y; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Zhou Q; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Yang D; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China., Yan R; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. yrljnu@163.com., Li R; The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. hqyylrm@126.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Archives of gynecology and obstetrics [Arch Gynecol Obstet] 2024 Aug; Vol. 310 (2), pp. 843-853. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 08.
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07267-3
Abstrakt: Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the performance, cost-effectiveness and additional findings of combined detailed ultrasound and biochemical screening for risks of major fetal trisomies in the first-trimester.
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis study, we estimated the risk of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 based on maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, nasal bone, ductus venosus pulsatility index velocity, tricuspid regurgitation, fetal heart rate, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in singleton pregnant women, and performed non-invasive prenatal testing for women with risks of trisomy 21 between 1:500 and 1:300. Invasive diagnostic testing was performed for women with positive or failed non-invasive prenatal testing result and in the high-risk group of this screening method. The direct costs were compared between this strategy and the non-invasive prenatal testing which alone used as first-line screening for all pregnant women.
Results: Among 25,155 singleton pregnant women who underwent screening, 24,361 were available for analysis, of these, 194 cases underwent non-invasive prenatal testing. Among the 24,361 women, 39, 19, and 7 had trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. The use of this strategy could potentially detect approximately 94.87% of trisomy 21 cases, 100% of trisomy 18 cases, and 100% of trisomy 13 cases, with false-positive rates of 2.49%, 0.41%, and 0.49%, respectively. The overall detection rate and overall false-positive rates were 96.92% and 2.52%, respectively. The detection rate was 100% in the advanced age group and 94.12% in the general age group. Additionally, structural abnormalities were detected in 137 fetuses, and 44 fetuses had other chromosomal abnormalities. The total cost of this strategy was $3,730,843.30, and the cost per person tested was $153.15. The total cost of using non-invasive prenatal testing as the first-line strategy would be $6,813,387.04 and the cost per person tested was $279.68.
Conclusions: Our strategy is an efficient and cost-effective approach for detecting major trisomies and identifying more fetuses with a potential abnormality. Therefore, this strategy is a valuable screening method and highly feasible in the clinical setting.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: