Relation Between Cognitive Assessment and Clinical Physical Performance Measures After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Autor:	Antonellis P; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. Electronic address: antonelp@ohsu.edu., Weightman MM; Courage Kenny Research Center-Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN., Fino PC; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT., Chen S; School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR., Lester ME; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX., Hoppes CW; Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX., Dibble LE; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT., King LA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [Arch Phys Med Rehabil] 2024 May; Vol. 105 (5), pp. 868-875. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 04.
DOI:	10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.013
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To investigate the relation between cognitive and motor performance in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and examine differences in both cognitive and motor performance between adults after mTBI and healthy controls. Design: Multi-center, cross-sectional study. Setting: Three institutional sites (Courage Kenny Research Center, Minneapolis, MN, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT). Participants: Data were collected from 110 participants (N=110), including those with mTBI and healthy controls, who completed cognitive and physical performance assessments. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome Measures: Cognitive assessments involved the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics to evaluate domains of attention, memory, reaction time, processing speed, and executive function. Physical performance was evaluated through clinical performance assessments, such as the 1-min walk test, the modified Illinois Agility Test, the Functional Gait Assessment Tool, the High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool, a complex turning course, and a 4-Item Hybrid Assessment of Mobility for mTBI. Participants also completed additional trials of the 1-min walk test, modified Illinois Agility Test, and complex turning course with a simultaneous cognitive task. Results: Individuals with mTBI performed worse on cognitive assessments, as well as several of the physical performance assessments compared with healthy controls. Complex tasks were more strongly related to cognitive assessments compared with simple walking tasks. Conclusions: Combining complex motor tasks with cognitive demands may better demonstrate functional performance in individuals recovering from mTBI. By understanding the relation between cognitive and physical performance in individuals recovering from mTBI, clinicians may be able to improve clinical care and assist in return to activity decision-making. (Copyright © 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu