Availability and Readability Level of Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Cleft Lip and Palate Teams.
| Autor: | Powell LE; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Bien EM; University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Cohen JM; University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Barta RJ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, HealthPartners, Saint Paul, MN, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association [Cleft Palate Craniofac J] 2023 Nov 05, pp. 10556656231213170. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 05. |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10556656231213170 |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: Evaluate the readability of online English and Spanish cleft lip and palate patient education materials. Design: Review of free online materials. Setting: English and Spanish language online patient education materials on cleft lip and palate were collected from American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams. Participants: American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams. Interventions: English materials were analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, and Coleman-Liau readability calculators. Spanish materials were analyzed using the Fry Graph, Fernandez Huerta, and INFLESZ calculators. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for variability between the readability tools. Outcomes: Readability levels were examined for both sets of materials. Results: 171 (90.5%) teams provided English language materials online, with an average readability score calculated as 10.5 ± 2.9 (10th-11th grade). A total of 44 (23.2%) teams listed Spanish language materials online, with average readability score of 7.9 ± 1.2 (8th grade). ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant variability between the readability assessment tools ( P < .01). Conclusion: Online cleft lip and palate patient education material provided by ACPA craniofacial teams were more available in English than in Spanish. Both sets of materials demonstrated readability levels above the recommended 6th-7th grade. Refining readability is associated with lowered healthcare costs and increased patient satisfaction. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|