Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Autor: | Ye Z; Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Clavel MA; Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec, Quebec, Canada., Foley TA; Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Pibarot P; Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec, Quebec, Canada., Enriquez-Sarano M; Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Michelena HI; Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA michelena.hector@mayo.edu. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Heart (British Cardiac Society) [Heart] 2024 Mar 22; Vol. 110 (8), pp. 594-602. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 22. |
DOI: | 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323281 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: CT aortic valve calcium score (AVC Methods: Retrospective single-centre study of patients with echocardiographic AS-severity and CT-AVC assessments within 6 months, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, all referred for clinical AS evaluation.Severe AS was defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm 2 or indexed AVA ≤0.6cm 2 /m 2 plus mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s. AVC was assessed by Agatston method. Results: Of the 1957 patients, 328 had BAV and 1629 had TAV, age 65±11 vs 80±9 years (p<0.001), men 65% vs 56% (p=0.006), respectively. BAV morphology was associated with higher AVC Conclusion: Valve calcification in AS differs according to valve morphology and sex. BAV-men with severe AS exhibit greater AVC Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |