Comparison of accuracy and reliability of CBCT and 3D laser scanner in the volumetric assessment of the root canal space.

Autor:	Thomas AR; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Manipal University College Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia, anchurachel@gmail.com., Soe HHK; Department of Community Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia., Silva CS; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, District General Hospital, Ampara, Sri Lanka., Kaur H; Klinik Pergigian Seri Impian, Bandar Seri, Kluang, Johor, Malaysia., Ganendrah LD; Klinik Pergigian Seri Impian, Bandar Seri, Kluang, Johor, Malaysia., Gomez LM; Klinik Pergigian Seri Impian, Bandar Seri, Kluang, Johor, Malaysia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	American journal of dentistry [Am J Dent] 2023 Oct; Vol. 36 (5), pp. 246-250.
Abstrakt:	Purpose: To compare the accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and laser scanner in measuring minor volume changes such as the root canal space. Methods: 35 maxillary incisors were endodontically prepared. A dimensionally stable silicone material was injected into the root canal space and scanned with CBCT. The root canal volume was measured using Romexis 3.0.1 R software. Replicas were carefully removed from the teeth and scanned using an extraoral laser scanner. These images were exported to the Rhinoceros software for volume measurement. The volume of each replica was also assessed using the gravimetric method. To determine the accuracy, the volume obtained from both devices was compared with the gravimetric method. Statistical analysis was done using a paired t-test. The reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the mean volume of CBCT 27.04 ± 7.25 mm³ and the mean volume of the gravimetric method 27.87 ± 7.17 mm³ (P< 0.05). A statistically significant difference was seen with the laser scanner at 25.31 ± 6.89 mm³ and the gravimetric method at 27.87 ± 7.17 mm³ (P< 0.05). CBCT showed a good degree of agreement (ICC 0.899), while the laser scanner showed a moderate degree of agreement (ICC 0.644) with the gravimetric method. CBCT proved accurate and reliable in measuring minor volumes like the root canal space, ideally in the range of 20-25 mm³. The laser scanner presented acceptable reliability. Clinical Significance: The laboratory data showed satisfactory outcomes, providing an evidence-based approach and potentially motivating clinicians to integrate cone-beam computed tomography for volume analysis into clinical practice. The accuracy and reliability of laser scanners for small-volume analysis have not previously been evaluated. Consequently, the findings from this study warrant further clinical investigations. Competing Interests: The authors declared no conflict of interest. (Copyright©American Journal of Dentistry.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu