Processing and storage methods affect oral and gut microbiome composition.
| Autor: | Superdock DK; Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States., Zhang W; School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States., Poole AC; Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in microbiology [Front Microbiol] 2023 Oct 03; Vol. 14, pp. 1253570. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 03 (Print Publication: 2023). |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1253570 |
| Abstrakt: | In microbiome studies, fecal and oral samples are stored and processed in different ways, which could affect the observed microbiome composition. In this study, we compared storage and processing methods applied to samples prior to DNA extraction to determine how each affected microbial community diversity as assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We collected dental swabs, saliva, and fecal samples from 10 individuals, with three technical replicates per condition. We assessed four methods of storing and processing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction. We also compared different fractions of thawed saliva and dental samples to fresh samples. We found that lyophilized fecal samples, fresh whole saliva samples, and the supernatant fraction of thawed dental samples had the highest levels of alpha diversity. The supernatant fraction of thawed saliva samples had the second highest evenness compared to fresh saliva samples. Then, we investigated the differences in observed community composition at the domain and phylum levels and identified the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) that significantly differed in relative abundance between the conditions. Lyophilized fecal samples had a greater prevalence of Archaea as well as a greater ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes compared to the other conditions. Our results provide practical considerations not only for the selection of storage and processing methods but also for comparing results across studies. Differences in processing and storage methods could be a confounding factor influencing the presence, absence, or differential abundance of microbes reported in conflicting studies. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2023 Superdock, Zhang and Poole.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|