The use of intra-abdominal prophylactic drainage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it change in relation to surgical expertise? A multicenter case-control retrospective study on postoperative outcomes.

Autor:	Brucchi F; State University of Milan, Milan, Italy - brucchi.francesco@gmail.com.; Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Sesto San Giovanni, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy - brucchi.francesco@gmail.com., Mehmeti M; Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Sesto San Giovanni, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy., Lauricella S; Milano-Bicocca University, Milan, Italy., Faillace G; Department of General Surgery, Edoardo Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Minerva surgery [Minerva Surg] 2024 Apr; Vol. 79 (2), pp. 155-160. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 18.
DOI:	10.23736/S2724-5691.23.09934-3
Abstrakt:	Background: The routine use of abdominal drainage (AD) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still controversial. The aim of this expertise-based study is to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic AD in terms of postoperative complications and analyze the factors linked to AD placement. Methods: This case-control retrospective study included patients with cholelithiasis who underwent LC with AD (AD group) and LC without drainage (no-AD group) in two Italian centers. Allocation to groups was non-randomized and based on surgeons' decisions. Patient's characteristics, operative results, postoperative outcomes, surgeon's expertise related data were compared between the two groups with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Patients in the two groups were comparable for age, sex ratio, and morbidity. Length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) in the no-AD group was shorter than the AD group. Patients in the AD group had a higher rate of wound infection. No difference in postoperative pain measured 7 days after the surgery was found. Our results show an association between the first operator's expertise and age and the decision of placing the AD. The operative time seems to be the principal factor impacting the decision whether to place or not the AD. Conclusions: Our results indicate that it is feasible not to insert routine AD after elective LC for cholelithiasis. The use of AD seems to cause more cases of postoperative wound infections, prolongs the LOS and the operative time. The drain placement choice seems to change in relation to the surgeon's expertise.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu