| Autor: |
Brush BL; University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Israel B; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Coombe CM; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Lee SD; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA., Jensen M; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Wilson-Powers E; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Gabrysiak A; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Chandanabhumma PP; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Baker E; Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Jones M; Healthy Native Communities Partnership, Inc., Shiprock, NM, USA., Lachance L; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Partnerships that effectively engage in certain key structural and process functions are more likely to meet their research goals and contribute to longer-term health equity outcomes. Ongoing evaluation of partnerships' level of achievement of these key functions, along with their fidelity to the guiding principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR), is therefore essential to understand how they can achieve desired partnership outcomes. This article describes the validated Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire and the use of an accompanying Facilitation Guide in helping members of CBPR partnerships evaluate their partnership's state of development and interpret findings to improve its structure, processes, and outcomes. We describe the conceptual framework guiding the development of the MAPS Questionnaire and its 81-item across seven key outcome dimensions, along with 28 items measuring precursor characteristics of CBPR partnership outcomes. The Facilitation Guide provides general guidelines for sharing, interpreting, and applying results within partnerships using a participatory process, definitions and items for each dimension, an example of presenting summary means, and dimension-specific reflective questions for discussion. We offer recommendations for practical uses of the MAPS Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide. Whether used as a comprehensive tool or by dimension, the MAPS Questionnaire is conceptually sound and empirically validated for evaluating how CBPR partnerships can achieve long-standing success. CBPR partnerships at any stage of development will find the MAPS Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide useful in measuring and interpreting indicators of partnership success, sharing results, and improving their ability to contribute to achieving health equity goals. |
