"No PBL is better than online PBL": Qualitative exploration regarding the perceived impact of online problem-based learning on nursing and medical students' learning during COVID-19 lockdown.

Autor:	Adongo PR; Busitema University., Epuitai J; Busitema University., Mpagi JL; Busitema University., Nekaka R; Busitema University., Lyagoba I; Busitema University., Odula J; Busitema University., Oboth P; Busitema University.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Research square [Res Sq] 2023 Sep 20. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 20.
DOI:	10.21203/rs.3.rs-3296163/v1
Abstrakt:	The COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions increased the adoption of online learning even in low-income countries. The adoption of online teaching methods may have affected teaching and learning, particularly in settings where it was used for the first time. This study was conducted to explore the perceptions of medical and nursing students regarding the impact of online delivery of problem-based learning (PBL) on students learning and academic performance during COVID-19 imposed restrictions. Methods and Materials: This was a qualitative study among fourth and fifth-year nursing and medical undergraduate students at Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences. Four focused group discussions were conducted and the interviews focused on students' perceptions, experiences, and attitudes toward the PBL process conducted online and its likely impact on their learning. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. Results: Four themes were identified that represented perceptions of online PBL on learning: transition to online learning; perceived benefits of online learning; limited learning and poor performance; and lost soft and practical skills. During the initial stages of introduction to online PBL learning, students transitioning to online had to adapt and familiarize themselves with online learning following the introduction of online learning. Students perceived that learning was less online compared to face-to-face sessions because of reduced learner engagement, concentration, motivation, peer-to-peer learning, and limited opportunities for practical sessions. Online learning was thought to increase students' workload in the form of a number of assessments which was thought to reduce learning. Online tutorials were perceived to reduce the acquisition of soft skills like confidence, communication, leadership, and practical or clinical skills. While learning was thought to be less during online teaching, it was noted to allow continued learning during the lockdown, to be flexible, enhance self-drive and opportunity for work, solve infrastructure problems, and protect them from COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Generally, online learning enabled continuity and flexibility of learning. However, online PBL learning was perceived to be less engaging compared to traditional classroom-based PBL. Online PBL was seen to deter students from acquiring critical generic and clinical skills inherently found in traditional PBL. Innovative pedagogical measures should be adopted to avoid reduced learning noted in the online teaching methods to ensure the successful adoption of online teaching and learning in the post-COVID-19 era. Competing Interests: Competing interests. The authors declare no competing interests.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu