Scoping Review of Restorative Justice in Academics and Medicine: A Powerful Tool for Justice Equity Diversity and Inclusion.

Autor:	Sawin G; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA., Klasson CL; University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA., Kaplan S; Duke University Medical Center Library and Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA., Larson Sawin J; Independent Researcher and Restorative Justice Consultant, Durham, North Carolina, USA., Brown A; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA., Thadaney Israni S; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.; Rx for RJ Initiative, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA., Schonberg J; Office for Faculty, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA., Gregory A; Kenan Institute for Ethics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Health equity [Health Equity] 2023 Sep 29; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 663-675. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 29 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.1089/heq.2023.0071
Abstrakt:	Purpose: Restorative Justice (RJ) as a practice and mindset is growing within academic medicine and health care. The authors aim to categorize the extent to which RJ training and practices have been researched, explored, and applied within health care, medicine, and academic contexts. Methods: In July 2021, the authors conducted a scoping literature review, searching four databases for peer-reviewed articles and book chapters discussing RJ. Authors also used bibliography searches and personal knowledge to add relevant work. Reviewers independently screened article titles and abstracts, assessing the full texts of potentially eligible articles with inclusion and exclusion criteria. From each included article, authors extracted the publication year, first author's country of origin, specific screening criteria met, and the depth with which it discussed RJ. Results: From 599 articles screened, 39 articles, and books were included (published 2001-2021). Twenty-five (64%) articles discussed RJ theory with few describing application practices with substantial depth. Ten (26%) articles only referenced the term "restorative justice" and seven (18%) discussed legal applications in health care. Fifty-four percent were from outside the United States. Articles tended to describe RJ uses to address harm and often missed the opportunity to explore RJ's capacity to proactively build community and culture that helps prevent harm. Conclusions: RJ in health care is a rapidly expanding field that offers a framework capable of building stronger communities, authentically preventing and responding to harm, inviting radical inclusion of diverse participants to build shared understanding and culture, and ameliorate some of the most toxic and unproductive hierarchical practices in academics and medicine. Most literature calls to RJ for help to respond to harm, although there are very few well-designed and evaluated implementations. Investment in RJ practices holds significant promise to steer our historically hierarchical, "othering" and imperfect systems to align with values of justice (vs. punishment), equity, diversity, and inclusion. Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist. (© Gregory Sawin et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu