Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols.

Autor: Morton D; Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Implant, Esthetic and Innovative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Wismeijer D; TPE, Private Practice, Ellecom, The Netherlands., Chen S; Periodontics, Melbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Hamilton A; Division of Oral Restorative and Rehabilitative Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia., Wittneben J; Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland., Casentini P; Private Practice, Milan, Italy., Gonzaga L; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Implant Dentistry, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Florida, USA., Lazarin R; Discipline of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Martin W; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Implant Dentistry, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Florida, USA., Molinero-Mourelle P; Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland., Obermailer B; Private Practice, La Plata, Argentina., Polido WD; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Implant, Esthetic and Innovative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Tahmaseb A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Thoma D; Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Zembic A; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical oral implants research [Clin Oral Implants Res] 2023 Sep; Vol. 34 Suppl 26, pp. 349-356.
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14137
Abstrakt: Objectives: Working Group 5 was convened to discuss and find consensus on the topics of implant placement and loading protocols associated with single missing teeth in the anterior maxilla (aesthetic zone). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions were developed and presented to the plenary for discussion and approval.
Materials and Methods: Two systematic reviews were developed and submitted prior to the conference. The group considered in detail the systematic reviews and developed statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions based on the findings of the reviews and experience of group members. Definitive versions were developed after presentation to and discussion by the plenary.
Results: Five consensus statements were developed and approved from each systematic review. Twelve clinical recommendations were developed by the group based on both reviews and experience. Three patient perspectives were developed, and five suggestions made for future research.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of the systematic reviews and experience of group members, the Type 1A protocol (immediate placement and immediate loading), when utilized in the anterior maxilla under favorable conditions, is considered predictable and is associated with high survival rates. The procedure is considered clinically viable and is associated with aesthetic outcomes, although surgical, technical, and biological complications can occur.
(© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE