The Impact of Ovulation Calculators on the Stress Levels of Fertility-Seeking Couples: An Evaluation Study.
Autor: | Ledesma BR; Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA., Suarez Arbelaez MC; Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA., Grewal M; Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA., Marquez K; Urology, Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miami, USA., Palmerola K; Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVFMD, Miami, USA., Ghomeshi A; Urology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA., Ramasamy R; Urology, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2023 Aug 23; Vol. 15 (8), pp. e43972. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 23 (Print Publication: 2023). |
DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.43972 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction Infertility affects a significant portion of couples seeking pregnancy, leading to stress and emotional strain. Ovulation calculators, widely used as a tool to predict fertile days, may play a role in the stress experienced by couples undergoing fertility treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ovulation calculators on the stress levels of couples seeking fertility. Methods Participants were recruited from the University of Miami Health System Clinics. Fifty couples consulting for infertility were asked to participate in the study and complete anonymous self-reported surveys. The surveys consisted of validated questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. The completed surveys were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data collected included age, number of years trying to conceive, and answers to questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. Responses from 50 couples who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Results A total of 50 couples who were attempting conception and who completed all the questionnaires were included in the study. Whether or not they were using ovulation calculators, females scored similarly in the four variables of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), including arousal, orgasm, satisfaction, and lubrication. When evaluating International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores for male erectile function, the average score of males tracking ovulation was 12.0 ± 4.8, compared to 11.5 ± 5.4 in male patients who were not (P = 0.81). The results showed no statistically significant difference in stress levels between couples who used ovulation calculators and those who did not. However, in couples experiencing higher stress levels due to infertility, both male and female participants reported higher levels of sexual dysfunction. Fertility-related stress was also found to be significantly associated with mental health implications, with increased anxiety and depression reported by couples undergoing fertility treatments. Conclusion The findings suggest that the use of ovulation calculators did not significantly influence the stress experienced by couples seeking fertility treatment. However, the study highlights the significant impact of infertility-related stress on sexual function and mental health in both male and female partners. These results emphasize the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of infertility and providing comprehensive support to couples undergoing fertility treatments. Further research is warranted to explore the complex interplay between ovulation calculator usage, infertility-related stress, sexual dysfunction, and mental health implications in couples seeking to conceive. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating mental health support into fertility treatment programs to optimize patient outcomes and overall well-being. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2023, Ledesma et al.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |