Using the Disruptive Score to Identify Publications That Changed Plastic Surgery Practice.

Autor:	Neubauer DC; From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA., Blum JD; University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA., Labou SG; Library, University of California San Diego., Heskett KM; Library, University of California San Diego., Calvo RY; Scripps Mercy Hospital., Reid CM; From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA., Martin MJ; Trauma Critical Care, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA., Gosman AA; From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Annals of plastic surgery [Ann Plast Surg] 2022 May 01; Vol. 88 (4 Suppl 4), pp. S385-S390.
DOI:	10.1097/SAP.0000000000003144
Abstrakt:	Purpose: The impact of academic publications is often characterized by the total number of future citations. However, this metric does not adequately characterize the true impact in terms of changing practices or paradigms. A new metric called the "disruption score" (DS) has been developed and validated in nonsurgical publications. This study aims to use the DS to identify the most disruptive publications in plastic surgery.The DS, a ratio of 2 numbers, varies between -1 and +1. Scores closer to -1 are developing papers that summarize the known literature while papers closer to +1 are disruptive-they result in a paradigm shift in the field of study. Methods: A search was performed for all articles from 1954 to 2014 in the following journals: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Aesthetic Surgery Journal; Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery; Annals of Plastic Surgery; Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; Clinics in Plastic Surgery; and Plastic Surgery. The disruptive score was calculated for each article.The top 100 papers ranked by DS were examined and any editorials/viewpoints, publications with less than 26 citations, or less than 3 references were excluded because of their subjective nature and smaller academic contribution. The remaining 64 publications were analyzed for topic, study type, and citation count. Results: A total of 32,622 articles were found with a DS range from 0.385 to 0.923. The mean score of the top 64 articles was 0.539 with an average citation count of 195 and 9 references. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery had the most disruptive papers with 50. There were no randomized controlled trials with a majority of the studies being technical descriptions or case series. Conclusions: There are many ways to measure academic success, but there are fewer ways to measure the impact of academic contributions. The DS is a novel measurement that can demonstrate when an article results in a paradigm shift as opposed to just total citation count. When applied to the plastic surgery literature, the DS demonstrates that technical innovation and creativity are the most academically impactful. Future evaluations of academic success should include the DS to measure the quality of academic contributions. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared. (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu