Utilization of Rectal Examinations Before Magnetic Resonance Defecography Studies.

Autor:	Schrum CJ; From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH., Dickinson MM; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH., Shah ED; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI., Speicher MR; American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, Bethesda, MD., Strohbehn K; From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) [Urogynecology (Phila)] 2024 Feb 01; Vol. 30 (2), pp. 153-160.
DOI:	10.1097/SPV.0000000000001404
Abstrakt:	Importance: More information is needed to guide referring subspecialists on the appropriate patient evaluation before magnetic resonance defecography (MRD). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate how often health care providers perform digital rectal examination (DRE) before ordering MRD to investigate causes of bowel and pelvic floor complaints. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort review, including MRD performed on female patients at an integrated health care system from 2016 through 2020. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of documented rectal examination in the year before defecography by the referring provider or 6 months prior by a primary care physician or pelvic floor physical therapist. We hypothesized that the overall rate of rectal examination would be high and unaffected by the referring provider's subspecialty. Results: Three hundred-four defecography tests were performed, with 209 patients (68.8%) referred by gastroenterology providers and 95 (31.2%) from other specialties. Gastroenterologists performed DRE in 32.8% of patients, in contrast to 84.4% of patients referred by other specialties ( P < 0.001). When comparing subspecialties that most commonly refer patients for MRD (gastroenterology, colorectal surgery and urogynecology), there was a statistically significant difference between gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons ( P < 0.001) as well as urogynecologists ( P < 0.001) but no difference in the rate of rectal examination between colorectal surgeons and urogynecologists ( P = 1.00). Conclusions: At our single integrated health system, the rate of DRE before MRD testing varied significantly by specialty. Our findings highlight the need for better understanding of DRE utility in the algorithms for evaluation of bowel and pelvic floor disorders. (Copyright © 2024 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu