Evaluation of Abfraction Lesions Restored with Three Dental Materials: A Comparative Study.

Autor: Costăchel BC; Doctoral School in Dental Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University of Bucharest, 189 Calea Văcăreşti, 040056 Bucharest, Romania., Bechir A; Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University of Bucharest, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 031592 Bucharest, Romania., Burcea A; Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University of Bucharest, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 031592 Bucharest, Romania., Mihai LL; Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University of Bucharest, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 031592 Bucharest, Romania., Ionescu T; Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University of Bucharest, 67A Gh. Petrascu Street, 031592 Bucharest, Romania., Marcu OA; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 P-ta 1 Decembrie, 410073 Oradea, Romania., Bechir ES; Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gh. Marinescu Street, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinics and practice [Clin Pract] 2023 Aug 26; Vol. 13 (5), pp. 1043-1058. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 26.
DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13050093
Abstrakt: Background: Abfraction lesions are manifested as damage to hard tissues in the cervical area of dental crowns. The study aimed to assess the direct restoration of abfraction lesions according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for 24 months. The restorations were accomplished with Fuji Bulk-GC, Omnichroma Flow-Tokuyama, and Beautifil ® II-Shofu dental materials, and the therapy was or was not associated with wearing thermoformed mouthguards.
Methods: From the 53 selected and analyzed patients ( n = 53), 28 patients (with restorations of abfraction lesions) belonged to the 1st group and 25 patients (with 105 restorations, who also wore mouthguards) belonged to the 2nd group. Blind determination assessments were effectuated at baseline and after 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Results showed that, regardless of the rating score, there are no significant statistical differences in the evaluation criteria between the two groups of patients Conclusions: For each material, the scores of USPHS criterion presented good clinical performances after 24 months, with no significant statistical differences between the fillings and the applied therapy in the two groups of patients.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje