Comparison of Force During the Endotracheal Intubation of Commercial Simulation Manikins.
| Autor: | Hughes KE; Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA., Islam MT; Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA., Co B; Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA., Lopido M; Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA., McNinch NL; Biostatistics, McNinch Biostats, LLC (Limited Liability Company), Kent, USA., Biffar D; Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA., Subbian V; Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA., Son YJ; Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA., Mosier JM; Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2023 Aug 20; Vol. 15 (8), pp. e43808. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 20 (Print Publication: 2023). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.43808 |
| Abstrakt: | Background Medical simulation allows clinicians to safely practice the procedural skill of endotracheal intubation. Applied force to oropharyngeal structures increases the risk of patient harm, and video laryngoscopy (VL) requires less force to obtain a glottic view. It is unknown how much force is required to obtain a glottic view using commercially available simulation manikins and if variability exists. This study compares laryngoscopy force for a modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade I view in both normal and difficult airway scenarios between three commercially available simulation manikins. Methods Experienced clinicians (≥2 years experience) were recruited to participate from critical care, emergency medicine, and anesthesia specialties. A C-MAC size 3 VL blade was equipped with five force resistor reading (FSR) sensors (four concave surfaces, one convex), measuring resistance (Ohms) in response to applied pressure (1-100 Newtons). The study occurred in a university simulation lab. Using a randomized sequence, 49 physicians performed intubations on three manikins (Laerdal SimMan 3GPlus, Gaumard Hal S3201, CAE Apollo) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The outcomes were sensor mean pressure, peak force, and CL grade. Summary statistics were calculated. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) conducted for both scenarios assessed changes in pressure measured in three manikins while accounting for correlated responses of individuals assigned in random order. Paired t-test assessed for the in-manikin difference between scenarios. STATA/BE v17 (R) was used for analysis; results interpreted at type I error alpha is 0.05. Results Participants included 49 experienced clinicians. Mean years' experience was 4(±6.6); median prior intubations were 80 (IQR 50-400). Mean individual sensor pressure varied within scenarios depending on manikin (p<0.001). Higher mean forces were used in difficult scenarios (603.4±128.9, 611.1±101.4, 467.5±72.4 FSR) than normal (462.5±121.9, 596.0±90.5, 290.6±63.2 FSR) for each manikin (p<0.001). All manikins required more peak force in the difficult scenario (p<0.03). The highest mean forces (Laerdal, CAE, difficult scenario) were associated with the higher frequency of grade 2A views (p<0.001). The Gaumard manikin was rated most realistic in terms of force required to intubate. Conclusion Commercially available high-fidelity manikins had significant variability in laryngoscopy force in both normal and difficult airway scenarios. In difficult airway scenarios, significant variability existed in CL grade between manikin brands. Experienced clinicians rated Gaumard Hal as the most realistic force applied during endotracheal intubation. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2023, Hughes et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|