Discriminant validity of the current gingivitis classification in adolescents: a cohort study.

Autor: Sfreddo CS; Department of Semiology and Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves Street, 457, 509 Room, Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96015-560, Brazil. camilassfreddo@gmail.com., Oliveira LM; Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, 26F Building, Santa Maria, Camobi, RS, 97105-900, Brazil., Gomes BZ; Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves Street, 457, Centro, Pelotas, RS, 96015-560, Brazil., Ardenghi TM; Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, 26F Building, Santa Maria, Camobi, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2023 Nov; Vol. 27 (11), pp. 6513-6521. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 19.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05256-z
Abstrakt: Objectives: To compare the prevalence of gingivitis estimated by the 2018 European Federation of Periodontology/American Academy of Periodontology (EFP/AAP) classification with the other case definitions and assess the ability of this classification system in discriminating sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the presence of gingivitis in a cohort study.
Materials and Methods: A multistage random sample of 1134 12-year-old adolescents was submitted to a full-mouth examination according to the Community Periodontal Index. Socioeconomic and clinical variables were collected at baseline. Gingivitis was considered according to the following criteria: (a) ≥ 10% of bleeding sites (the 2018 EFP/AAP criteria); (b) ≥ 15% of bleeding sites; and (c) the mean full-mouth bleeding sites. Adjusted multilevel Poisson regression assessed the association between independent variables at baseline and each definition of gingivitis at 2-year follow-up.
Results: Seven hundred forty-two 14-year-old adolescents were re-revaluated at follow-up. The prevalence of gingivitis was 28.7% according to 10% of bleeding threshold. The 2018 EFP/AAP criteria and other definitions showed higher prevalence and mean of gingivitis for low-household income adolescents and for those with higher levels of dental plaque and untreated dental caries. Nonetheless, the highest strengths of association were observed for the threshold of ≥ 15% of bleeding sites.
Conclusion: The 2018 EFP/AAP case definition of gingivitis showed a similar discriminant validity compared to the 15% threshold and the mean full-mouth bleeding sites.
Clinical Relevance: The 2018 EFP/AAP classification allows the discrimination of important risk factors and should be used for the establishment of priorities for large-scale therapeutic programs.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE