Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections.

Autor: AbiMansour JP; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Jaruvongvanich V; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Queen's Health System, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA., Velaga S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Law RJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Storm AC; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Topazian MD; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Levy MJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Alexander R; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Vargas EJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Bofill-Garcia A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Matin JA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Petersen BT; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Abu Dayyeh BK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA., Chandrasekhara V; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2024 Jan; Vol. 99 (1), pp. 104-107. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 16.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.005
Abstrakt: Background and Aims: Coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) placement is often performed within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to prevent adverse events (AEs) such as stent occlusion and bleeding. This study compares the safety and outcomes of LAMSs alone versus LAMSs with coaxial DPPSs for PFC management.
Methods: Patients undergoing drainage of a PFC with LAMSs were retrospectively identified and categorized as LAMS or LAMS/DPPS based on initial drainage strategy. The AE rate, AE type, and clinical success were extracted by chart review.
Results: One hundred eighty-five individuals (83 LAMS, 102 LAMS/DPPS) were identified. No significant differences were found in rates of clinical success (75.9% LAMS vs 69.6% LAMS/DDPS, P = .34) or overall AEs (15.7% LAMS vs 15.7% LAMS/DPPS, P = .825).
Conclusions: In this comparative single-center study, placement of a coaxial DPPS for drainage of PFCs with LAMSs did not affect rates of AEs or clinical success.
Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: R. Law: Consultant for ConMed and Medtronic; royalties from UpToDate. A. C. Storm: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery; research support from Apollo Endosurgery and Boston Scientific. B. T. Petersen: Consultant for Olympus America; investigator for Boston Scientific and Ambu. B. K. Abu Dayyeh: Consultant for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, BFKW, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; research support from Cairn Diagnostics, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; speaker for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson. V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Covidien LP and Boston Scientific; shareholder in Nevakar Corporation. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
(Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: