Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development - Short (SED-S) with other scales for emotional development.

Autor: Sappok T; Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Mara Hospital, University Clinic for People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Bielefeld, Germany., Morisse F; Psychiatric Centre Dr. Guislain, Ghent, Belgium.; Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Flachsmeyer M; Faculty of Medicine, Charité University, Berlin, Germany., Vandevelde S; Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium., Ilic M; Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Mara Hospital, University Clinic for People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Bielefeld, Germany., Barrett BF; St. Lukas-Klinik, Liebenau Kliniken, Liebenau, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR [J Intellect Disabil Res] 2023 Oct; Vol. 67 (10), pp. 1061-1068. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 06.
DOI: 10.1111/jir.13081
Abstrakt: Background: Different instruments were devised for assessing emotional development (ED) level in persons with an intellectual disability (ID), that is, the Scale of Emotional Development - Short (SED-S), the Scheme for Appraisal of Emotional Development (SAED), the Scale for Emotional Development - Second Revision (SED-R 2 ) and the Schaal voor Emotionele Ontwikkeling - Lukas (SEO-Lukas). The aim of this study was to compare the level of emotional functioning as assessed with the SED-S with the SAED, SED-R 2 and SEO-Lukas.
Methods: Emotional development was measured in adults with ID with the SED-S (N = 186) and the SAED (n = 85), the SED-R 2 (n = 50) and the SEO-Lukas (n = 51). Correlation analysis and Cohen's kappas were calculated between the SED-S and the three respective scales. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of the four scales were determined.
Results: The SED-S results correlated most with the SEO-Lukas (γ = 1; кω = 0.936) followed by the SAED (γ = 0.809; кω = 0.343) and least by the SED-R 2 (γ = 0.665; кω = 0.182). The stage of ED assessed with the SED-S was lower than the ED results measured with the SAED, but higher than with the SED-R 2 and most similar to the SEO-Lukas. Cronbach's alphas were high, ranging from 0.853 to 0.975.
Conclusions: Given the respective differences between the scales, the SED-S may equalise the results as compared with previous versions.
(© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje