Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency.

Autor:	Metzner C; Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., Stringham A; Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., Hislop B; Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., Bonham J; Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., Chatterton L; Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., DeFigueiredo R; Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA., Charles SK; Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.; Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) [Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)] 2023 Sep 01; Vol. 13, pp. 30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 01 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.5334/tohm.740
Abstrakt:	Background: Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigation. Also, prior studies have only used a narrow range of stimulation parameters, so stimulation parameters have not been optimized. Our purpose was to further investigate synchronous submotor stimulation and identify the effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression. Methods: We quantified the effect of brief, synchronous stimulation at 15 different frequencies from 10-150 Hz applied over wrist flexors and extensors on both tremor power and frequency in 20 ET patients. We compared tremor power and frequency from hand acceleration and sEMG between pre-, per-, and post-stimulation phases. Results: Our stimulation paradigm did not result in significant tremor suppression or tremor frequency changes at any tested stimulation frequency, showing no significant interaction between phase and stimulation frequency for tremor power measured by either hand acceleration (p = 0.69) or sEMG (p = 0.07). Additionally, the effect of phase interacting with stimulation frequency on tremor frequency was statistically insignificant for acceleration (p = 0.64) and sEMG (p = 0.37). Discussion: We conclude that brief synchronous submotor-threshold stimulation does not reduce tremor in ET patients, independent of stimulation frequency (from 10 to 150 Hz). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that brief submotor-threshold stimulation suppresses tremor via reciprocal inhibition, which requires asynchronous stimulation. In contrast, it is hypothesized that synchronous stimulation might require longer stimulation durations to affect supraspinal tremor networks. Highlights: We studied the effects of synchronous submotor electrical stimulation over wrist flexor and extensor muscles on Essential Tremor. Our results indicate that suppressing tremor with brief synchronous stimulation is ineffective. Based on recently hypothesized mechanisms of peripheral tremor suppression, we hypothesize that asynchronous stimulation or long-duration synchronous stimulation are more effective approaches to peripheral tremor suppression. Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare. (Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu