Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing.

Autor: Krebs CE; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 5100 Wisconsin Ave., NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20016-4131, USA., Camp C; Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments, Cawley House, 149-155 Canal Street, Nottingham, NG1 7HR, UK., Constantino H; Humane Society International Europe, Avenue des Arts 50, Brussels, 1000, Belgium., Courtot L; Animal Free Research UK, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX, UK., Kavanagh O; York St. John University, Lord Mayor's Walk, York, YO31 7EX, UK., McCarthy J; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 5100 Wisconsin Ave., NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20016-4131, USA., Ort MJ; Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 20, 14195, Berlin, Germany.; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany., Sarasija S; Humane Society International Canada, 372 St. Catherine St. West Suite 319, Montreal, QC, H3B 1A2, Canada., Trunnell ER; People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA, 23510, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) [Adv Sci (Weinh)] 2023 Oct; Vol. 10 (30), pp. e2303226. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 30.
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202303226
Abstrakt: There is growing recognition that animal methods bias, a preference for animal-based methods where they are not necessary or where nonanimal-based methods may already be suitable, can impact the likelihood or timeliness of a manuscript being accepted for publication. Following April 2022 workshop about animal methods bias in scientific publishing, a coalition of scientists and advocates formed a Coalition to Illuminate and Address Animal Methods Bias (COLAAB). The COLAAB has developed this guide to be used by authors who use nonanimal methods to avoid and respond to animal methods bias from manuscript reviewers. It contains information that researchers may use during 1) study design, including how to find and select appropriate nonanimal methods and preregister a research plan, 2) manuscript preparation and submission, including tips for discussing methods and choosing journals and reviewers that may be more receptive to nonanimal methods, and 3) the peer review process, providing suggested language and literature to aid authors in responding to biased reviews. The author's guide for addressing animal methods bias in publishing is a living resource also available online at animalmethodsbias.org, which aims to help ensure fair dissemination of research that uses nonanimal methods and prevent unnecessary experiments on animals.
(© 2023 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje