| Autor: |
Paternostro C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Joura EA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Ranftl C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Langthaler EM; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Ristl R; Center of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Dorittke T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Pils S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. |
| Abstrakt: |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the endocervical margin status according to transformation zone (TZ) and high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) subtype in specimens with cone length ≤ 10 mm versus > 10 mm to provide data for informed decision making and patients counseling especially for women wishing to conceive. In this retrospective cohort study, 854 patients who underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone during a nine-year period (2013-2021) for cervical disease were analyzed. The main outcome parameters were excision length, histological result, TZ type, HPV subtype and endocervical margin status. A subgroup analysis was performed according to excision length, with a cut-off value of 10 mm. A two-step surgical procedure was performed in case of an excision length of > 10 mm. The overall rate of positive endocervical margins irrespective of excision length was 17.2%, with 19.3% in specimens with ≤ 10 mm and 15.0% with > 10 mm excision length. Overall, 41.2% of women with a visible TZ and HPV 16/hr infection and 27.0% of women with HPV 18 received an excisional treatment of > 10 mm length without further oncological benefit, respectively. In contrast, assuming that only an excision of ≤ 10 mm length had been performed in women with visible TZ, the rate of clear endocervical margins would have been 63.7% for HPV 16/hr infections and 49.3% for HPV 18 infections. In conclusion, the decision about excision length should be discussed with the patient in terms of oncological safety and the risk of adverse pregnancy events. An excision length > 10 mm increases the number of cases with cervical tissue removed without further oncological benefit, which needs to be taken into account in order to provide an individual therapeutic approach. Furthermore, HPV 18 positivity is related to a higher rate of positive endocervical margins irrespective of TZ. |
