Dual versus Single Innervation of Gracilis Free Functional Muscle Transfer in Facial Paralysis: Long-Term Resting and Dynamic Outcomes.

Autor: Thachil R; From the Departments of Plastic Surgery., Wen YE; From the Departments of Plastic Surgery., Madrazo AZ; From the Departments of Plastic Surgery., Sanchez CV; From the Departments of Plastic Surgery., Reisch JS; Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center., Rozen SM; From the Departments of Plastic Surgery.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Plastic and reconstructive surgery [Plast Reconstr Surg] 2024 Sep 01; Vol. 154 (3), pp. 633-648. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 18.
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011005
Abstrakt: Background: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term tone and excursion in single- versus dual-innervated free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) in patients with longstanding facial paralysis.
Methods: Patients with longstanding facial palsy treated with an FFMT innervated either by a nerve-to-masseter graft (single-innervation group) or nerve-to-masseter and cross-facial-nerve grafts (dual-innervation group) were included. One-year minimum follow-up was required. Outcome measures, based on standardized photographs, included excursion, smile angle, teeth exposure, commissure height deviation, and upper lip height deviation in repose and in closed and open-teeth smile preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively. Emotrics software and ImageJ software were used to take measurements. Between-group and within-group longitudinal comparisons were analyzed.
Results: At 3 years (single, n = 24; dual, n = 13), significance was found between groups in commissure position (single, 26.42 mm versus dual, 31.51 mm; P < 0.0001) and excursion with open-mouth smile (single, 31.32 mm versus dual, 26.59 mm; P < 0.001). Single-innervation FFMT within-group analysis lacked significant improvement in commissure height deviation and upper lip height deviation at 3 years in repose, whereas the dual-innervation group revealed significant improvements (3.67 mm [ P < 0.001], 3.17 mm [ P < 0.001], respectively). Teeth exposure revealed an increase in the dual-innervation group (single, 35.753 mm 2 versus dual, 64.177 mm 2 ), but significance was not observed.
Conclusion: Dual-innervated FFMT revealed improvements in resting tone and teeth exposure with minimal decrease in smile excursion compared with single-innervated FFMT.
Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.
(Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)
Databáze: MEDLINE