Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice.

Autor: Shan HM; Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. huimin.shan@uzh.ch.; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. huimin.shan@uzh.ch., Maurer MA; Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Schwab ME; Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC biology [BMC Biol] 2023 Aug 17; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 177. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 17.
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y
Abstrakt: Background: The Rotarod test with commercial apparatus is widely used to assess locomotor performance, balance and motor learning as well as the deficits resulting from diverse neurological disorders in laboratory rodents due to its simplicity and objectivity. Traditionally, the test ends when rodents drop from the accelerating, turning rod, and the only parameter used commonly is "latency to fall". The values of individual animals can often vary greatly.
Results: In the present study, we established a procedure for mice with 4 consecutive days of training with 4 trials per day and modified the testing procedure by placing the mice back on the rod repeatedly after each fall until the trial ends (5 min). Data from the fourth training day as baseline results showed that the second, third and fourth trial were more consistent than the first, probably due to habituation or learning. There was no difference between the second, third and fourth trial, two trials may be sufficient in testing. We also introduced 3 additional read-outs: Longest duration on the rod (s), Maximal distance covered (cm), and Number of falls to better evaluate the motor capacity over the 5 min of testing. We then used this 4-parameter analysis to capture the motor deficits of mice with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries (by a weight dropping on the skull (Marmarou model)). We found that normalization of data to individual baseline performance was needed to reduce individual differences, and 4 trials were more sensitive than two to show motor deficits. The parameter of Maximal distance was the best in detecting statistically significant long-term motor deficits.
Conclusions: These results show that by making adjustments to the protocol and employing a more refined analysis, it is possible to expand a widely used routine behavioral test with additional accessible parameters that detect relevant deficits in a model of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. The modified Rotarod test maybe a valuable tool for better preclinical evaluations of drugs and therapies.
(© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje