Comparative evaluation of subgingival scaling and polishing techniques on dental material surface roughness.

Autor:	DelPriore K; College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., Ismail HS; Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt, hoda_saleh@mans.edu.eg.; Visiting Research Scholar, Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., Morrow BR; Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., Hill AE; Department of General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., Garcia-Godoy F; Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA, fgarciagodoy@gmail.com.; The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	American journal of dentistry [Am J Dent] 2023 Aug; Vol. 36 (4), pp. 207-212.
Abstrakt:	Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effects of different scaling and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of four different restorative materials. Methods: 72 specimens were prepared, molded to a size of 8.0 by 2.0 mm, and cured according to the manufacturers' instructions. The specimens were stored at 37°C for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 5,000 cycles (from 55°C to 5°C) to simulate 6 months of clinical use. Surface roughness (Ra/average and Rz/max-overall heights) was calculated using a stylus profilometer by subtracting the simulated treatments of hand scaling, ultrasonic scaling, and air polishing from the baseline measurements. The difference in Ra and Rz data were compared independently for each measurement using a two-way ANOVA on Ranks and the Holm-Sidak test, with α< 0.05 used to determine significance. Results: Irrespective of the scaling or polishing technique employed, flowable bulk fill demonstrated the lowest Ra and Rz values. Hand scaling exhibited the highest roughness and variability among the other techniques, regardless of the materials tested (P< 0.001). Air polishing with glycine resulted in the lowest roughness values across all tested materials, with the exception of the tested bioactive restorative material group. Clinical Significance: Regarding surface roughness, air polishing with glycine may be an effective and safe intervention for periodontal maintenance of subgingival restorations compared to the other tested scaling methods. Competing Interests: The authors declared no conflict of interest. Supported by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Dentistry Alumni Endowment Fund and the Tennessee Dental Association Foundation. (Copyright©American Journal of Dentistry.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu