Cost benefit analysis and pathology review of ileostomy and colostomy specimens processed over a 20-year period.

Autor: Semenova K; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, CA, 92868 USA., Lee W; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, CA, 92868 USA., Shah S; California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, 92324 USA., Shah S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, CA, 92868 USA., Chandan VS; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, CA, 92868 USA. Electronic address: vchandan@hs.uci.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Human pathology [Hum Pathol] 2023 Nov; Vol. 141, pp. 1-5. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 12.
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.08.002
Abstrakt: Rising healthcare costs have been linked to overtreatment and overuse of available resources. Identifying and eliminating low-value services is vital for reducing such costs. At many institutions, including ours, all ileostomy and colostomy specimens are sent for pathological evaluation. It is estimated that approximately 120,000 ileostomy/colostomy procedures are done every year, and at least 1 million patients have stomas at any given time in North America. Hence, we decided to analyze the pathological findings and cost-benefit of undertaking the pathological evaluation of these colostomy and ileostomy specimens. The pathology database of our department was searched for all ileostomy and colostomy specimens received between 2000 and 2020, resulting in a total of 2762 cases (1944 ileostomy and 818 colostomy). We performed a cost-benefit analysis and pathologic review of these cases. The results of our study show that 99.38% of these specimens did not show any significant pathological abnormality, and non-neoplastic pathologic findings accounted for 99.63% of cases. Less than 1% of our cases showed any clinically significant pathological findings. All 10 cases that showed a neoplastic or malignant diagnosis showed some abnormal finding that was appreciated at the time of gross examination. We conclude that microscopic evaluation of ileostomy and colostomy specimens incurs significant costs and provides no clear value or relevant information for patient care. The results of our study provide support for ileostomy and colostomy specimens to be triaged by gross-only pathological examination in the first instance for the vast majority of cases.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: