Anesthetic management for lower extremity vascular bypass procedures: The impact of general or regional anesthesia on clinical outcomes.
Autor: | Schmidt AP; Serviço de Anestesia e Medicina Perioperatória, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde (ICBS), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Serviço de Anestesia, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Serviço de Anestesia, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Pneumológicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Anestesiologia, Ciências Cirúrgicas e Medicina Perioperatória, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil., Del Maschi MM; Serviço de Anestesia e Medicina Perioperatória, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil., Andrade CF; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Pneumológicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Vascular [Vascular] 2024 Dec; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 1191-1201. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 04. |
DOI: | 10.1177/17085381231193492 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: Postoperative complications after major surgery, especially vascular procedures, are associated with a significant increase in costs and mortality. Previous studies evaluating general anesthesia versus regional or neuraxial anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass have produced conflicting results. The main aim of the present study is to review current evidence on the application of regional or general anesthesia in patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery and its potential favorable effects on postoperative outcomes. Contents: Patients undergoing vascular surgery often have multiple comorbidities, and it is important to outline both benefits and risks of regional anesthesia techniques. Neuraxial anesthesia in vascular surgery allows overall avoidance of general anesthesia and does provide short-term benefits beyond analgesia. Previous observational studies suggest that neuraxial anesthesia for lower limb revascularization may reduce morbidity and length of stay. However, evidence of long-term benefits is lacking in most procedures and further work is still warranted. Conclusions: Neuraxial anesthesia is usually an effective anesthesia technique for infrainguinal bypass surgery. Elderly patients and those with underlying respiratory problems may display some benefit from neuraxial anesthesia. Further evaluation within institutions should be performed to identify which patients would most benefit from regional techniques. Notably, systemic antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy is common among this population and may affect anesthetic choices. Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |