Assessing the Sensitivity of OCT-A Retinal Vasculature Metrics.

Autor:	Szpernal J; School of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Gaffney M; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Linderman RE; Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Langlo CS; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.; Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension St. Joseph Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Hemsworth K; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Walesa A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Higgins BP; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Rosen RB; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA., Chui TYP; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA., Carroll J; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.; Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Translational vision science & technology [Transl Vis Sci Technol] 2023 Aug 01; Vol. 12 (8), pp. 2.
DOI:	10.1167/tvst.12.8.2
Abstrakt:	Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the sensitivity of quantitative metrics of the retinal vasculature derived from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) images. Methods: Full retinal vascular slab OCT-A images were obtained from 94 healthy participants. Capillary loss, at 1% increments up to 50%, was simulated by randomly removing capillary segments (1000 iterations of randomized loss for each participant at each percent loss). Thirteen quantitative metrics were calculated for each image: foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel density, vessel complexity index (VCI), vessel perimeter index (VPI), fractal dimension (FD), and parafoveal intercapillary area (PICA) measurements with and without the FAZ (mean PICA, summed PICA, PICA regularity, and PICA standard deviation [PICA SD]). The sensitivity of each metric was calculated as the percent loss at which 80% of the iterations for a participant fell outside of two standard deviations from the sample's normative mean. Results: The most used OCT-A metrics, FAZ area and vessel density, were not significantly different from normative values until 27.69% and 16.00% capillary loss, respectively. Across the remaining metrics, metric sensitivity ranged from 6.37% (PICA SD without FAZ) to 39.78% (Summed PICA without FAZ). Conclusions: The sensitivity of vasculature metrics for detecting random capillary loss varies substantially. Further efforts simulating different patterns of capillary loss are needed for comparison. Additionally, mapping the repeatability of metrics over time in a normal population is needed to further define metric sensitivity. Translational Relevance: Quantitative metrics vary in their ability to detect vascular abnormalities in OCT-A images. Metric choice in screening studies will need to balance expected capillary abnormalities and the quality of the OCT-A images being used.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu