Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices and remote monitoring activations.
Autor: | García-Fernández FJ; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología., Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain. Electronic address: javyergf@secardiologia.es., Calvo Simal S; Unidad de Investigación, Fundación Burgos por las Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Cano Pérez Ó; Unidad de Arritmias, área de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain., Calvo Cuervo D; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain., Pombo Jiménez M; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain., Fernández Lozano I; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain., Villagraz Tercedor L; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología., Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Fernández Palacios G; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología., Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain., Martín González J; Unidad de Arritmias, Servicio de Cardiología., Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | English; Spanish; Castilian |
Zdroj: | Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.) [Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)] 2024 Mar; Vol. 77 (3), pp. 243-253. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 27. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rec.2023.07.003 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction and Objectives: Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is considered more reliable, efficient, and safer than conventional in-person follow-up. However, the implementation of RM is still suboptimal. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of CIED implants and RM activations in Spain. Methods: The COVID-19 RM Spain Registry was used to analyze the monthly number of all CIED implantations and RM activations from January 2018 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed using aggregated data from the five major CIED manufacturers. Results: A total of 205 345 CIEDs were recorded. The number of implants decreased sharply (48.2%) during the pandemic lockdown (March-June 2020) but gradually increased thereafter, compensating for the previous reduction. However, pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) showed an aggregate loss of 7% and 3%, respectively, from the annual average during 2020-2021. In contrast, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) increased by 17%, and pacemakers (CRT-P) by 4.5% over the 2-year period. The percentage of RM activations increased from 24.5% in 2018 to 49.0% in 2021, with a sharp increase during the lockdown. The RM activation rates consistently increased during the lockdown for all devices: pacemakers (14.4% vs 37.2%; P <.001); ICD (75.6% vs 94.2%; P <.001); CRT-D/CRT-P (68.6-44.2% vs 81.6-61%; P <.001), and implantable loop recorders (50.2% vs 68.7%; P <.001). Conclusions: The significant decline in implants during the lockdown gradually recovered, except for pacemakers and ICD. However, the COVID-19 pandemic boosted RM for all CIEDs in Spain. (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |