Autor: |
Tu LH; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT 06510., Navaratnam D; Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Melnick ER; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Forman HP; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT 06510., Venkatesh AK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Malhotra A; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT 06510., Yaesoubi R; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT., Sureshanand S; Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Sheth KN; Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Mahajan A; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, Tompkin's East 2, New Haven, CT 06510. |
Abstrakt: |
BACKGROUND. CT with CTA is widely used to exclude stroke in patients with dizziness, although MRI has higher sensitivity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness who undergo CT with CTA alone versus those who undergo MRI in terms of stroke-related management and outcomes. METHODS. This retrospective study included 1917 patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 776 men, 1141 women) presenting to the ED with dizziness from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. A first propensity score matching analysis incorporated demographic characteristics, medical history, findings from the review of systems, physical examination findings, and symptoms to construct matched groups of patients discharged from the ED after undergoing head CT with head and neck CTA alone and patients who underwent brain MRI (with or without CT and CTA). Outcomes were compared. A second analysis compared matched patients discharged after CT with CTA alone and patients who underwent specialized abbreviated MRI using multiplanar high-resolution DWI for increased sensitivity for posterior circulation stroke. Sensitivity analyses were performed involving MRI examinations performed as the first or only neuroimaging examination and involving alternative matching and imputation techniques. RESULTS. In the first analysis (406 patients per group), patients who underwent MRI, compared with patients who underwent CT with CTA alone, showed greater frequency of critical neuroimaging results (10.1% vs 4.7%, p = .005), change in secondary stroke prevention medication (9.6% vs 3.2%, p = .001), and subsequent echocardiography evaluation (6.4% vs 1.0%, p < .001). In the second analysis (100 patients per group), patients who underwent specialized abbreviated MRI, compared with patients who underwent CT with CTA alone, showed greater frequency of critical neuroimaging results (10.0% vs 2.0%, p = .04), change in secondary stroke prevention medication (14.0% vs 1.0%, p = .001), and subsequent echocardiography evaluation (12.0% vs 2.0%, p = .01) and lower frequency of 90-day ED readmissions (12.0% vs 28.0%, p = .008). Sensitivity analyses showed qualitatively similar findings. CONCLUSION. A proportion of patients discharged after CT with CTA alone may have benefitted from alternative or additional evaluation by MRI (including MRI using a specialized abbreviated protocol). CLINICAL IMPACT. Use of MRI may motivate clinically impactful management changes in patients presenting with dizziness. |