Emergence of persistent institutionalized inequality at the Bridge River site, British Columbia: the roles of managerial mutualism and coercion.

Autor: Prentiss AM; Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 USA., Foor TA; Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 USA., Hampton A; Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 USA., Walsh MJ; Modern History and World Cultures Section, The National Museum of Denmark, Ny Vestergade 10 Prinsens Palæ, 1471 Copenhagen, Denmark., Denis M; Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 USA., Edwards A; Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences [Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci] 2023 Aug 14; Vol. 378 (1883), pp. 20220304. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 26.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0304
Abstrakt: Persistent institutionalized inequality (PII) emerged at the Bridge River site by ca 1200-1300 years ago. Research confirms that PII developed at a time of population packing associated with unstable fluctuations in a critical food resource (anadromous salmon) and persisted across multiple generations. While we understand the demographic and ecological conditions under which this history unfolded, we have yet to address details of the underlying social process. In this paper, we draw on Bridge River's Housepit 54 to examine two alternative hypotheses. Hypothesis 1, mutualism, suggests that household heads signalled to maintain and attract new members as a means of supporting the demographic viability of the house. Inequality is indicated by variation in prestige markers but less obviously in economic fundamentals. Hypothesis 2, coercion, asserts that the more successful households developed control over access to critical food resources, forcing others into the choice between emigration and subjugation. Inequality is indicated by inter-family differences in prestige markers and economic fundamentals. Results suggest that inequality emerged under a mutualism scenario but persisted for subsequent generations under more coercive conditions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary ecology of inequality'.
Databáze: MEDLINE