Exploring perspectives on assistive technology use: barriers, facilitators, and access.

Autor:	Monden KR; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of MN Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Charlifue S; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., Philippus A; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of MN Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Kilbane M; Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA., Muston-Firsch E; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., MacIntyre B; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., Welch A; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., Baldessari J; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., Coker J; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CA, USA., Morse LR; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of MN Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology [Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol] 2024 May; Vol. 19 (4), pp. 1676-1686. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 27.
DOI:	10.1080/17483107.2023.2227235
Abstrakt:	Purpose: This qualitative study explored perceived barriers and facilitators to access and utilization of assistive technology (AT) among Veterans and civilians living with tetraplegia. We also explored differences in access to and utilization of AT between civilians and Veterans. Materials and Methods: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 32 adults (15 Veterans, 17 non-Veterans) living with tetraplegia between the ages of 18 and 65 and who were at least one-year post-injury. Focus groups were conducted at two rehabilitation sites: Craig Hospital and the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center. Participants were asked to discuss what they perceive as (1) the facilitators and barriers of AT access and utilization, and (2) the value of AT use in everyday living. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts. Results and Conclusions: Facilitators of AT utilization and access included being connected to resources, trial-and-error, and knowledge gained from peers. Barriers to AT use included cost of devices, a general lack of awareness of resources, and requirements for eligibility; the latter two themes were endorsed solely by Veteran participants. Benefits of AT included increased independence, participation, productivity, quality of life, and safety. Findings highlight key facilitators of AT procurement and use, barriers that contribute to underutilization of AT, and important benefits experienced as a result of using AT that underscore the importance of AT for individuals with SCI.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu