The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences.

Autor: Kikuchi DW; Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.; Evolutionary Biology, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany., Allen WL; Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK., Arbuckle K; Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK., Aubier TG; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, UMR 5174, CNRS/IRD, Toulouse, France., Briolat ES; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK., Burdfield-Steel ER; Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Cheney KL; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia., Daňková K; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic., Elias M; Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, CNRS, MNHN, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France.; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama., Hämäläinen L; School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Herberstein ME; School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Hossie TJ; Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada., Joron M; CEFE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France., Kunte K; National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, India., Leavell BC; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA., Lindstedt C; Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Lorioux-Chevalier U; Laboratoire Écologie, Évolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA), Université de Guyane, CNRS, IFREMER, Cayenne, France., McClure M; Laboratoire Écologie, Évolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA), Université de Guyane, CNRS, IFREMER, Cayenne, France., McLellan CF; School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Medina I; School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Nawge V; National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, India., Páez E; Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, CNRS, MNHN, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France., Pal A; National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, India., Pekár S; Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic., Penacchio O; School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.; Computer Vision Center, Computer Science Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain., Raška J; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic., Reader T; School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK., Rojas B; Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.; Department of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland., Rönkä KH; HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.; Research Programme in Organismal & Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Rößler DC; Zukunftskolleg, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.; Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany., Rowe C; Institute of Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., Rowland HM; Max Planck Research Group Predators and Toxic Prey, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany., Roy A; Laboratoire Écologie, Évolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA), Université de Guyane, CNRS, IFREMER, Cayenne, France., Schaal KA; Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Sherratt TN; Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Skelhorn J; Institute of Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., Smart HR; Hawkesbury Institute of the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia., Stankowich T; Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, California, USA., Stefan AM; Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Summers K; Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA., Taylor CH; School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK., Thorogood R; HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.; Research Programme in Organismal & Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Umbers K; Hawkesbury Institute of the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.; School of Science Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia., Winters AE; Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK., Yeager J; Grupo de Biodiversidad Medio Ambiente y Salud, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador., Exnerová A; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of evolutionary biology [J Evol Biol] 2023 Jul; Vol. 36 (7), pp. 975-991. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 26.
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14192
Abstrakt: Prey seldom rely on a single type of antipredator defence, often using multiple defences to avoid predation. In many cases, selection in different contexts may favour the evolution of multiple defences in a prey. However, a prey may use multiple defences to protect itself during a single predator encounter. Such "defence portfolios" that defend prey against a single instance of predation are distributed across and within successive stages of the predation sequence (encounter, detection, identification, approach (attack), subjugation and consumption). We contend that at present, our understanding of defence portfolio evolution is incomplete, and seen from the fragmentary perspective of specific sensory systems (e.g., visual) or specific types of defences (especially aposematism). In this review, we aim to build a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing the evolution of multiple prey defences, beginning with hypotheses for the evolution of multiple defences in general, and defence portfolios in particular. We then examine idealized models of resource trade-offs and functional interactions between traits, along with evidence supporting them. We find that defence portfolios are constrained by resource allocation to other aspects of life history, as well as functional incompatibilities between different defences. We also find that selection is likely to favour combinations of defences that have synergistic effects on predator behaviour and prey survival. Next, we examine specific aspects of prey ecology, genetics and development, and predator cognition that modify the predictions of current hypotheses or introduce competing hypotheses. We outline schema for gathering data on the distribution of prey defences across species and geography, determining how multiple defences are produced, and testing the proximate mechanisms by which multiple prey defences impact predator behaviour. Adopting these approaches will strengthen our understanding of multiple defensive strategies.
(© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: