Human vs. machine-like representation in chatbot mental health counseling: the serial mediation of psychological distance and trust on compliance intention.

Autor: Park G; Department of Journalism and Media Studies, New Mexico State University, 2915 McFie Circle, Milton Hall 158, Las Cruces, NM USA., Chung J; Senior Researcher, Convergence and Open Sharing System-Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University, 25- 2 Sungkyunkwan-Ro, 50212 Hoam Hall, Jongno-Gu, 03063 Seoul, South Korea., Lee S; Department of Media and Communication, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, 50505 Hoam Hall, Jongno-Gu, 03063 Seoul, South Korea.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) [Curr Psychol] 2023 Apr 20, pp. 1-12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 20.
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04653-7
Abstrakt: This study examined a serial mediation mechanism to test the effect of chatbots' human representation on the intention to comply with health recommendations through psychological distance and trust towards the chatbot counselor. The sample of the study comprised 385 adults from the USA. Two artificial intelligence chatbots either with human or machine-like representation were developed. Participants had a short conversation with either of the chatbots to simulate an online mental health counseling session and reported their experience in an online survey. The results showed that participants in the human representation condition reported a higher intention to comply with chatbot-generated mental health recommendations than those in the machine-like representation condition. Furthermore, the results supported that both psychological distance and perceived trust towards the chatbot mediated the relationship between human representation and compliance intention, respectively. The serial mediation through psychological distance and trust in the relationship between human representation and compliance intention was also supported. These findings provide practical guidance for healthcare chatbot developers and theoretical implications for human-computer interaction research.
Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no potential conflict of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
(© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)
Databáze: MEDLINE