Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Differences in Primary Care No-Show Risk with Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Autor: Shah DA; HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA. dania.aijaz.shah@gmail.com., Sharer R; HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; HonorHealth Clinical Informatics, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; College of Medicine, University of Arizona-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Sall D; HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; College of Medicine, University of Arizona-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Bay C; Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA., Turner A; HonorHealth Family Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Bisk D; HonorHealth Family Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Peng W; HonorHealth Academic Affairs, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Gifford B; HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; HonorHealth Clinical Informatics, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Rosas J; Neighborhood Outreach Access to Health (NOAH) Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA., Radhakrishnan P; HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; HonorHealth Clinical Informatics, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; College of Medicine, University of Arizona-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.; HonorHealth Academic Affairs, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2023 Sep; Vol. 38 (12), pp. 2734-2741. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 12.
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08236-x
Abstrakt: Background: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in rapid implementation of telemedicine. Little is known about the impact of telemedicine on both no-show rates and healthcare disparities on the general primary care population during the pandemic.
Objective: To compare no-show rates between telemedicine and office visits in the primary care setting, while controlling for the burden of COVID-19 cases, with focus on underserved populations.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Multi-center urban network of primary care clinics between April 2021 and December 2021.
Participants: A total of 311,517 completed primary care physician visits across 164,647 patients.
Main Measures: The primary outcome was risk ratio of no-show incidences (i.e., no-show rates) between telemedicine and office visits across demographic sub-groups including age, ethnicity, race, and payor type.
Results: Compared to in-office visits, the overall risk of no-showing favored telemedicine, adjusted risk ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.71), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.0%. This favorability was most profound in several cohorts with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences with risk ratios in Black/African American 0.47 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.53), ARR 9.0%; Hispanic/Latino 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.68), ARR 4.6%; Medicaid 0.58 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.62) ARR 7.3%; Self-Pay 0.64 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.70) ARR 11.3%.
Limitation: The analysis was limited to physician-only visits in a single setting and did not examine the reasons for visits.
Conclusion: As compared to office visits, patients using telemedicine have a lower risk of no-showing to primary care appointments. This is one step towards improved access to care.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.)
Databáze: MEDLINE