Autor: |
Hughes RL; Independent Researcher, Seattle, WA 98115, USA., Frankenfeld CL; Public Health Program, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA 98416, USA., Gohl DM; University of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.; Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Developmental Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA., Huttenhower C; Department of Biostatistics and Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.; Harvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA., Jackson SA; Complex Microbial Systems Group, Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA., Vandeputte D; Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA., Vogtmann E; Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA., Comstock SS; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA., Kable ME; USDA-ARS Western Human Nutrition Research Center, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
Abstrakt: |
The microbial cells colonizing the human body form an ecosystem that is integral to the regulation and maintenance of human health. Elucidation of specific associations between the human microbiome and health outcomes is facilitating the development of microbiome-targeted recommendations and treatments (e.g., fecal microbiota transplant; pre-, pro-, and post-biotics) to help prevent and treat disease. However, the potential of such recommendations and treatments to improve human health has yet to be fully realized. Technological advances have led to the development and proliferation of a wide range of tools and methods to collect, store, sequence, and analyze microbiome samples. However, differences in methodology at each step in these analytic processes can lead to variability in results due to the unique biases and limitations of each component. This technical variability hampers the detection and validation of associations with small to medium effect sizes. Therefore, the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) Nutritional Microbiology Group Engaging Members (GEM), sponsored by the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS), hosted a satellite session on methods in nutrition and gut microbiome research to review currently available methods for microbiome research, best practices, as well as tools and standards to aid in comparability of methods and results. This manuscript summarizes the topics and research discussed at the session. Consideration of the guidelines and principles reviewed in this session will increase the accuracy, precision, and comparability of microbiome research and ultimately the understanding of the associations between the human microbiome and health. |