Validation of the Korean version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire in clinical clerkship of Korean medical students.

Autor: Lee YJ; Department of Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea., Kim YR; Department of Medical Education Humanities, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea., Lee HH; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea., Kyung SY; Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea., Jung SR; Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea., Park KH; Department of Medical Education, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea., Yune SJ; Department of Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Korean journal of medical education [Korean J Med Educ] 2023 Jun; Vol. 35 (2), pp. 153-163. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 01.
DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2023.256
Abstrakt: Purpose: This study aims to verify whether the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ) developed by Priddis and Rogers is valid in the Korean context to identify the level of reflection of medical students in clinical practice.
Methods: A total of 202 third- and fourth-year medical students from seven universities participated in the study. After receiving approval for use from the authors, a survey was conducted on the students through an adaptation process. The original scale consists of 10 factors with 40 items. The Self-efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale (SECP), Korean Self-reflection and Insight Scale (K-SRIS), and Reflection-in-Learning Scale (RinLS) were used to validate the scale. Exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, correlation, and reliability analyses were used for data analysis.
Results: As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 10 subfactors were extracted (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.856, Bartlett's test: χ 2 =5,044.337, degrees of freedom=780, p<0.001). Among the 40 items, one that showed a high overlapping load for other factors was excluded. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the 10-factor structure model was found suitable (χ 2 =1.980, comparative fit index=0.859, Tucker-Lewis index=0.841, root mean square error of approximation=0.070). As a result of the criterion validity test, most of the subfactors of the Korean version of the RPQ (K-RPQ) showed a positive correlation with K-SRIS, RinLS, and SECP. The reliability of 10 subfactors was satisfactory, ranging from 0.666 to 0.919.
Conclusion: The K-RPQ was confirmed to be a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reflection among Korean medical students in clinical clerkship. This scale can be used as a tool to provide feedback on each student's level of reflection in clinical clerkship.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: