Post-intensive care syndrome in primary care: The development of new diseases and primary care services utilisation - a prospective cohort study.

Autor:	van Sleeuwen D; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.; Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., de Man S; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Zegers M; Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Akkermans R; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Ricking M; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Peters M; Department of Intensive Care, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., van den Boogaard M; Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., van de Laar FA; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The European journal of general practice [Eur J Gen Pract] 2023 Dec; Vol. 29 (1), pp. 2213476.
DOI:	10.1080/13814788.2023.2213476
Abstrakt:	Background: Patients experience long-lasting health problems defined as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Little is known about PICS in primary care. Objectives: To investigate whether ICU survivors encounter more new International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) diagnoses and general practitioner (GP) contact compared to patients with similar comorbidity without ICU admission. Methods: Prospective multicentre cohort study in three Dutch general practices. Numbers of disease-episodes and GP contacts of ICU survivors ≥ 16 years admitted between 2008 and 2017 were extracted from GPs' information systems. A non-ICU reference cohort was matched 1:1 for age, sex, follow-up period and comorbidity groups from patients' medical history. Negative binominal regression analysis was used to compare both cohorts 0-3, 3-6, 6-12 months, 1-2 and 2-5 years after ICU admission and 1 year prior to admission. Results: ICU survivors ( n  = 199) encountered more new disease-episodes 1 year before (mean 3.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.50-4.52]]; reference 2.36 [1.28-3.17]) to 2-5 years after ICU admission (3.65 [3.15-4.26]; reference 2.86 [2.52-3.22]). ICU survivors also had more GP contacts 1 year before (mean 19.61 [17.31-22.17]; reference 10.02 [7.81-12.38]) to 2-5 years after ICU admission (18.53 [15.58-21.85]; reference 12.03 [10.33-13.91]). Patients with prior ICU admission did not encounter patterns in specific ICPC-2 chapters compared to non-ICU patients. Conclusion: Patients admitted to the ICU encounter more new primary care disease-episodes and GP contacts. As patients present their symptoms to their GP first, it is therefore up to the GP to recognise these critical illness-related symptoms.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu