| Autor: |
Kalodimou G; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Jany S; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Freudenstein A; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Schwarz JH; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Limpinsel L; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Rohde C; Institute of Virology, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Gießen-Marburg-Langen, 35043 Marburg, Germany., Kupke A; Institute of Virology, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Gießen-Marburg-Langen, 35043 Marburg, Germany., Becker S; Institute of Virology, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Gießen-Marburg-Langen, 35043 Marburg, Germany., Volz A; Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hannover-Braunschweig, 30559 Hannover, Germany., Tscherne A; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany., Sutter G; Division of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany. |
| Abstrakt: |
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant human health and economic consequences. Due to the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to spread rapidly and to cause severe disease and mortality in certain population groups, vaccines are essential for controlling the pandemic in the future. Several licensed vaccines have shown improved protection against SARS-CoV-2 after extended-interval prime-boost immunizations in humans. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the immunogenicity of our two Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) based COVID-19 candidate vaccines MVA-SARS-2-S and MVA-SARS-2-ST after short- and long-interval prime-boost immunization schedules in mice. We immunized BALB/c mice using 21-day (short-interval) or 56-day (long-interval) prime-boost vaccination protocols and analyzed spike (S)-specific CD8 T cell immunity and humoral immunity. The two schedules induced robust CD8 T cell responses with no significant differences in their magnitude. Furthermore, both candidate vaccines induced comparable levels of total S, and S2-specific IgG binding antibodies. However, MVA-SARS-2-ST consistently elicited higher amounts of S1-, S receptor binding domain (RBD), and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in both vaccination protocols. Overall, we found very comparable immune responses following short- or long-interval immunization. Thus, our results suggest that the chosen time intervals may not be suitable to observe potential differences in antigen-specific immunity when testing different prime-boost intervals with our candidate vaccines in the mouse model. Despite this, our data clearly showed that MVA-SARS-2-ST induced superior humoral immune responses relative to MVA-SARS-2-S after both immunization schedules. |
