Proxy modeling approach to evaluate groundwater recharge potentiality zones in the data scarce area of upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.

Autor: Tegegne AM; Arba Minch Water Technology Institute, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. ananiasana117@gmail.com., Lohani TK; Arba Minch Water Technology Institute, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia., Eshete AA; Arba Minch Water Technology Institute, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Environmental monitoring and assessment [Environ Monit Assess] 2023 May 25; Vol. 195 (6), pp. 726. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 25.
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11274-x
Abstrakt: Prioritization of groundwater recharge potentiality evaluation is critical for sustainable water resources management. Since recharge is a main source for enhancing groundwater availability. Water scarcity is extremely severe in the upper Blue Nile Basin (i.e., Gunabay watershed). Therefore, this study emphasizes groundwater recharge delineating and mapping 3920.25 km 2 in the data-limited area of the upper Blue Basin using proxy modeling (i.e., WetSpass-M model and geodetector model) and tools. The driving/influencing factors are rainfall, temperature, wind speed, evapotranspiration, elevation, slope, land cover, soil, groundwater depth, drainage density, geomorphology, and geology that control the movement of groundwater recharge. However, the first nine factors were used as inputs in the WetSpass-M model to evaluate groundwater recharge. To validate the groundwater recharge availability, water table fluctuation was established based on recorded groundwater levels. Furthermore, the major influencing factors and their interaction have been quantified using geodetector model. Spatiotemporal recharge distribution (in mm) is classified as very low (0-6), low (6-30), moderate (30-51), high (51-83), and very high (83-508) comprising 21%, 20%, 20%, 20%, and 19% of the total area, respectively. Very high groundwater recharge zone has been found in the northwest part of the area. The geodetector results showed that soil (0.841) and temperature (0.287) had larger individual contributions, but the interaction between soil and temperature (0.962) was more significant. It indicates that the interaction between climate and soil has the largest influence on groundwater recharge variability. Generally, the overall approach of this study can be applied to water sectors, policymakers, and decision-makers to overcome future water scarcity.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
Databáze: MEDLINE