Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial.

Autor:	Aulbach MB; Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron Universitat Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria matthias.aulbach@plus.ac.at.; Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria., van Alebeek H; Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron Universitat Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria., Kahveci S; Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron Universitat Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria., Blechert J; Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron Universitat Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2023 Apr 25; Vol. 13 (4), pp. e070443. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 25.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet. Methods and Analysis: Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4 days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving. Ethics and Dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences. Trial Registration Number: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu