| Autor: |
Reinoso-Pérez MT; Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.; Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850., Dhondt KV; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853., Levitskiy AA; College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853., Dupont G; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544., Tulman ER; Center of Excellence for Vaccine Research, Department of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CN 06269., Geary SJ; Center of Excellence for Vaccine Research, Department of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CN 06269., Dhondt AA; Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, aad4@cornell.edu.; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850. |
| Abstrakt: |
Ever since 1994, when the bacterial pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum jumped from poultry to wild birds, it has been assumed that the primary host species of this pathogen in wild North American birds was the house finch ( Haemorhous mexicanus ), in which disease prevalence was higher than in any other bird species. Here we tested two hypotheses to explain a recent increase in disease prevalence in purple finches ( Haemorhous purpureus ) around Ithaca, New York. Hypothesis 1 is that, as M. gallisepticum evolved and became more virulent, it has also become better adapted to other finches. If this is correct, early isolates of M. gallisepticum should cause less-severe eye lesions in purple finches than in house finches, while more-recent isolates should cause eye lesions of similar severity in the two species. Hypothesis 2 is that, as house finch abundance declined following the M. gallisepticum epidemic, purple finches around Ithaca increased in abundance relative to house finches and purple finches are thus more frequently exposed to M. gallisepticum -infected house finches. This would then lead to an increase in M. gallisepticum prevalence in purple finches. Following an experimental infection with an early and a more-recent M. gallisepticum isolate, eye lesions in purple finches were more severe than in house finches. This did not a support Hypothesis 1; similarly, an analysis of Project Feeder Watch data collected around Ithaca did not show differences in changes in purple and house finches' abundance since 2006, a result which does not support Hypothesis 2. We conclude that purple finch populations will, unlike those of house finches, not suffer a severe decline because of a M. gallisepticum epidemic. |
