Physiology, Vitalism, and the Contest for Body and Soul in the Antebellum United States.
| Autor: | Riddle JD; Pepperdine University, California, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences [J Hist Med Allied Sci] 2023 Jul 08; Vol. 78 (3), pp. 227-248. |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jhmas/jrad021 |
| Abstrakt: | In the early nineteenth century, physiology became an increasingly popular and powerful science in the United States. Religious controversy over the nature of human vitality animated much of this interest. On one side of these debates stood Protestant apologists who wedded an immaterialist vitalism to their belief in an immaterial, immortal soul - and therefore to their dreams of a Christian republic. On the other side, religious skeptics argued for a materialist vitalism that excluded anything immaterial from human life, aspiring thereby to eliminate religious interference in the progress of science and society. Both sides hoped that by claiming physiology for their vision of human nature they might direct the future of religion in the US. Ultimately, they failed to realize these ambitions, but their contest posed a dilemma late nineteenth-century physiologists felt compelled to solve: how should they comprehend the relationship between life, body, and soul? Eager to undertake laboratory work and leave metaphysical questions behind, these researchers solved the problem by restricting their work to the body while leaving spiritual matters to preachers. In attempting to escape the vitalism and soul questions, late nineteenth-century Americans thus created a division of labor that shaped the history of medicine and religion for the following century. (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|