Assessing Cognitive-Motor Interference in Military Contexts: Validity and Reliability of Two Dual-tasking Tests.
Autor: | Gattoni C; School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NH, UK., Martinez-Gonzalez B; School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NH, UK.; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Centro Sportivo Universitario Record, Bologna 40127, Italy., Li C; School of Computing, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4AG, UK., Marcora SM; School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NH, UK.; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Centro Sportivo Universitario Record, Bologna 40127, Italy. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Military medicine [Mil Med] 2023 Aug 29; Vol. 188 (9-10), pp. e2900-e2908. |
DOI: | 10.1093/milmed/usad048 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Cognitive-motor interference is the decrease in cognitive performance and/or physical performance occurring when a cognitive task and a physical task are performed concurrently (dual task) compared to when they are performed in isolation (single task). The aim of this study was to investigate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of two cognitive-motor interference tests in military contexts. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two soldiers, officers, and cadets performed a 10-min loaded marching, a 10-min Psychomotor Vigilance Task, and the two tasks combined (visit 1). During visit 2, a 5-min running time trial, a 5-min Word Recall Task, and the two tasks combined. These tests were repeated by 20 participants after 2 weeks (visits 3 and 4). Results: Significant impairments were shown on both running distance (P < .001) and number of words recalled (P = .004) in the dual-task condition compared to the single-task condition. Significantly shorter step length (P < .001) and higher step frequency (P < .001) were found during the loaded marching in the dual-task condition compared to the single-task condition. No significant differences were observed in mean reaction time (P = .402) and number of lapses (P = .479) during the Psychomotor Vigilance Task. Good-to-excellent reliability was found for all the cognitive and physical variables in both single- and dual-task conditions, except for the number of lapses. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the Running + Word Recall Task test is a valid and reliable dual-tasking test that could be used to assess cognitive-motor interference in military contexts. (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |