Effect of Arthrodesis Device Type and Trajectory on Subtalar Joint Compression.

Autor: Beals CJ; Engineering Student, W. H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA., Dupont KM; Sr. Manager, Enovis Foot & Ankle, Clinical Affairs, Atlanta, GA., Gross CE; Associate Professor, Director of Foot & Ankle Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC., Safranski DL; Research Leader, Enovis Foot & Ankle, Clinical Affairs, Atlanta, GA; Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: david.safranski@enovis.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons [J Foot Ankle Surg] 2023 Sep-Oct; Vol. 62 (5), pp. 812-815. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 22.
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.04.005
Abstrakt: The use of subtalar arthrodesis procedures has been widely implemented to relieve hindfoot issues after failure of conservative treatments; however, fusion failures persist in some patients with certain risk factors. Currently, surgeons utilize cannulated screws in these arthrodesis procedures to immobilize the subtalar joint. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated improved fusion outcomes in at-risk patients using sustained dynamic compression devices in the tibiotalocalcaneal complex. These devices utilize pseudoelastic nitinol which enables sustained dynamic compression when faced with postoperative bone resorption, joint settling, and bone relaxation. While the clinical success of these devices has been established in the tibiotalocalcaneal complex, the ability of sustained dynamic compression devices to apply joint compression in the subtalar joint has not been quantified. As such, the goals of this study were to (1) compare the ability of static compression devices and sustained dynamic compression devices to apply joint compression and (2) assess the impact of device trajectory on joint compression. A custom mechanical testing fixture was utilized to test the compression applied across the subtalar joint by one sustained dynamic compression device (in anterior and posterior trajectories) as compared to 2 cannulated screws (in both parallel and diverging trajectories). Testing revealed the sustained dynamic compression devices generated 53% greater compression as compared to the static compression devices, despite single versus dual device usage, respectively. Additionally, both types of devices applied joint compression forces in an insertion trajectory-independent manner. These data illustrate the ability of a single SDC device to maintain significantly improved joint compressive forces as compared to 2 static cannulated screws, regardless of insertion trajectory. These SDC devices may be of particular interest for at-risk patients or in revision cases.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: