Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.

Autor: Brenner AT; Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. alison.brenner@unc.edu.; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. alison.brenner@unc.edu.; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. alison.brenner@unc.edu., Waters AR; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Wangen M; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Rohweder C; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Odebunmi O; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Marciniak MW; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Ferrari RM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Wheeler SB; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA., Shah PD; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Cancer causes & control : CCC [Cancer Causes Control] 2023 Dec; Vol. 34 (Suppl 1), pp. 99-112. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 19.
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x
Abstrakt: Purpose: To assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT™) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service quality rating).
Methods: We conducted a national online survey of non-institutionalized US adults through panels managed by Qualtrics, a survey research company. A total of 1,045 adults (response rate 62%) completed the survey between March and April 2021. Sampling quotas matched respondents to the 2010 US Census and oversampled rural residents. We assessed pharmacy use patterns by rurality and design preferences for learning about PharmFIT™; receiving a FIT kit from a pharmacy; and completing and returning the FIT kit.
Results: Pharmacy use patterns varied, with some notable differences across rurality. Rural respondents used local, independently owned pharmacies more than non-rural respondents (20.4%, 6.3%, p < 0.001) and rated pharmacy service quality higher than non-rural respondents. Non-rural respondents preferred digital communication to learn about PharmFIT™ (36% vs 47%; p < 0.001) as well as digital FIT counseling (41% vs 49%; p = 0.02) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns: respondents who pick up prescriptions in-person preferred to get their FIT (OR 7.7; 5.3-11.2) and return it in-person at the pharmacy (OR 1.7; 1.1-2.4).
Conclusion: Pharmacies are highly accessible and could be useful for expanding access to CRC screening services. Local context and pharmacy use patterns should be considered in the design and implementation of PharmFIT™.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE